'Kauravas were test-tube babies' comment at ISC draws flak f
Organisers of the science congress have expressed ‘shock’ at comments like Einstein and Newton didn’t understand physics, or Kauravas were test tube babies.

A day after two speakers made outlandish comments at the 106th Indian Science Congress (ISC), the association that organises the annual event has distanced itself from them and called the remarks “shocking”.

The Indian Science Congress Association (ISCA) has also resolved to exercise more caution while inviting speakers to the reputed event from next year.

Delivering a lecture at the children’s science congress Friday, Tamil Nadu-based scientist Kannan Jagathala Krishnan had challenged the theories of Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton and said they did not understand physics.

Another speaker at the event, V. Nageshwar Rao, the vice-chancellor of Andhra University, said the Kauravas of the Mahabharata were test-tube babies.

The comments made at the science congress this year were met with outrage from the science community. The Times of India reported Monday that several science organisations held a silent protest outside the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Sunday, with demonstrations planned across multiple cities Monday.

“We have decided that from next year, all speakers, including delegates who are invited for interaction with students, will have to submit their abstracts before. They will be strictly instructed not to deviate from what they have submitted. A member would be present to moderate all interactive sessions. A committee would be formed to monitor this,” said Premendu Mathur, general secretary (scientific activities) of the Indian Science Congress.

This, however, is not the first time that comments with no proven scientific basis have been made at the ISC.

In 2015, a paper presented on Indian aviation technology claimed that the ancient sage Bhardwaj had given detailed guidelines for making the aircraft. Captain Anand Bodas, a retired pilot who authored the paper, had quoted the Brihatvimanshastra to buttress his claims.

Last year, union minister for science and technology Dr Harsh Vardhan shocked the audience and organisers of the event when he said even Stephen Hawking had said that the “Vedas have better theories than Einstein’s”.

Read more: https://pxmd.co/p30BL and https://pxmd.co/7x9P1
A●●y and 7 others like this5 shares
Like
Comment
Share
A●●●●●●●●e A●●●●l K●●n
A●●●●●●●●e A●●●●l K●●n General Medicine
Sir you can search dr zakir naik' s videos on islam and science on YouTube
Jan 9, 2019Like
Dr. P●●●●●●●●h S●●h
Dr. P●●●●●●●●h S●●h Pathology
Science, as a philosophy, as an act of creative human endeavour is defined differently by different philosophers of science. One such stalwart Dr. Karl Raimund Popper defines science as a theory or observation about an event or object that can be falsified. If a proposition cannot be falsified, it cannot be called science. The statements of so called "wonders" and "miracles" in the various mythologies given the garb of science is just retrofitting present-day science and technology as being present in the olden days. Whether they were present or not, they surely had the imagination of them like Leonardo Da Vinci conceived of helicopters and automatons. But to give them full validity as science is fallacious because they cannot be falsified, as described by philosophers of science like Sir Popper.... Read more
Jan 9, 2019Like1
Dr. S●●●●m Pk
Dr. S●●●●m Pk Psychiatry
Lack of scientific temperament is the key issue. Individual may have a very high profile degree in science but unable to execute his cognition based on basic scientific principles when religious cultural factors came in to play.
Jan 10, 2019Like1